Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Getting Published’ Category

Reader_QandAWhat is the best way to pitch a story to a potential publisher? What if you have access to a great interview candidate (say, a prominent local artist) – should you go ahead with the interview, write the piece, and submit it to a magazine; or should you first find a publisher who would like the piece, and then schedule the interview?

Sounds like a chicken and egg conversation, doesn’t it?

Well, we thought it was an excellent question when Brit DeLong (a graduate student who contributes a health column to the DC Examiner and writes her own blog – Busy Girl Health – while studying publishing at The George Washington University) brought it to our attention. Here’s what some of our Live to Write – Write to Live experts had to say on the subject:

Susan NyeFrom Susan Nye:

Dear Brit,
Query first; interview and write the article after you get the go from an editor/publisher. As you will need to interview the subject of your article, you will be taking some of his/her time as well as setting expectations that an article will appear sometime in the future. The artist gives you time – you give him/her some publicity. You don’t want to take the artist away from his/her art unless you can deliver.
I suggest you query potential editors to find out if they are interested in the topic. Unfortunately many articles have trouble finding homes because the editor(s) of your target magazine(s) does not see a good fit for your topic – especially if your subject is local or regional and the number of potential publications is limited. Just because an idea is brilliant doesn’t mean a particular magazine will leap to buy it. In addition, many small magazines have their editorial calendars filled for months to come. If nothing else, the artist will know in advance that the article isn’t coming out until July 2014.
People like choices. I suggest that you put together three great ideas, you already have your first, and query editors with all three. Include examples of your work with your query. Published clips are preferable but unpublished articles can do in a pinch. More than one student has secured an assignment with an article from a journalism or creative writing class. I got my first gigs with a newsletter I wrote for friends and family. The examples should demonstrate that you are up for the tasks you propose – an in-depth interview of an artist and your other two ideas. In addition, try not to go too far afield on your proposed topics. Most editors will believe you are credible on a limited set of subjects. It can be hard to convince a stranger that you are capable of a story about an artist one day and venture capital fund management the next.
Good luck – Susan

 

wendy-shotFrom Wendy Thomas:
I would add:

Include photos, let the magazine know that you have photos ready to go along with the article (some mags take their own photos, others like to have them supplied.)

Also, it’s important to list all of the people and references you will use for your article. That’s a point that adds credibility to your pitch.

I’ve done articles both ways. Querying or pitching first is preferable. My most memorable article first, pitch second was when I interviewed Michelle Obama. The campaign headquarters chose me to interview her but as a freelancer I hadn’t yet placed the article. I spent the night before the interview calling up editors to see if one would take the article. Eventually one did accept it, but not before I grew myself a baby ulcer.

Trust me, it’s a lot easier to pitch before you promise a published final product.
 

headshot_jw_thumbnail… and a little PS from me:
I don’t have much to add since the feature/column work I’ve done has all been procured through my network and word-of-mouth referrals, so I haven’t been in a position of having to pitch a story. I trust that my colleagues know their stuff, though.
The only other, smallish piece of advice I’d offer is to make sure you follow best practices for your pitch and the etiquette of reaching out to an editor. As a blogger who is often approached by people who would like to guest post or otherwise appear on one of the blogs I either write or edit, I can attest to the sad majority of folks who haven’t got good sense about how to respectfully reach out to someone.
A few random thoughts:
  • Know about the publication you’re approaching – read a few of their other pieces (if not full issues, or a bunch of archived materials if the target pub is a blog).
  • If you can, reference a piece or two in your cover note – just briefly, but to make the point that you know what they are all about.
  • Proactive tip: If you have a few pubs you would really like to write for, get involved with their online community spaces (Facebook, Twitter, blog comments, Google+, etc.). This will make it a LOT easier for you to approach someone when the time comes.
  • There are dozens of great resources out there re: how to write a solid pitch, but a few things that always bear repeating:
    • Address it to a real person, vs. “Editor.”
    • Keep it brief and to the point.
    • Focus on how your piece will benefit the pub’s audience. Remember – this isn’t about you. It’s about the pub and their audience.

 
 

We were delighted to be able to share some of our insight and perspective with Brit. We wish her the best of luck with this project (and all future writing endeavors).
If you have questions for the writing team at Live to Write – Write to Live, please feel free to reach out to any one of us via our individual blogs or Twitter. We’d be happy to help out if we can. It’s all about sharing what we’ve learned.
Thanks for being here and being part of the conversation!
:)

 

Image Credit: base image by Rubin Alexander

Read Full Post »

I like to enter writing contests now and again, and in general prefer not to enter any that have a fee. I tend to like money coming to me for writing rather than away, which I’m sure you can relate to.

But there’s a short-story contest that caught my interest a few years ago that I like to enter, even though it has a fee. It’s the Writer’s Weekly 24-Hour Short Story Contest and it’s put on 4 times a year. The fee is $5 to enter.

There are a few reasons why I like this contest:

  • There are more than 85 prizes available
  • Top 3 prizes include cash amounts of $300, $250, or $200; and publication. Incentive!
  • It’s limited to 500 participants — 17% of total participants can win something (but, not all 500 submit by the deadline)
  • I don’t know the topic or word length until the bell rings – no stress over the prep :)
  • All participants have the same 24-hour period in which to write and submit
  • The rules are spelled out in detail and communicated on the website, in a downloadable PDF upon registration, and again at the start of the contest
  • Even though a prompt is the base of the contest, you don’t have to use it verbatim
  • There’s a lot of writing freedom
  • No specific genre
  • Encouraged to think outside the box
  • Tips are shared (i.e. it doesn’t impress the owner to have a character with her name or location in your story; put a title on the story; put your contact information at the end of the submission, and so much more)
  • If I end up not submitting, I don’t feel guilty over the $5 spent
  • I have time to write a draft and then step away from it (usually sleep on it), and then refine the piece before submitting
  • There are more than 85 prizes available (oh, am I repeating myself?) That’s a LOT of opportunity to win something!
  • It’s been around for quite a while
  • It’s always on a weekend (Saturday 1PM EST to Sunday 1PM EST)
  • The contest date It’s always announced weeks in advance, so I can schedule the time
  • When winners are announced, a summary of all entries is shared – common themes and endings – as a learning tool
  • It’s fun!
  • It’s a great break from ‘regular’ writing
  • I’ve placed in the contest a few times – and continue to strive for Top 3 at least once. :)
  • It’s good exercise for the muse
  • It’s a milestone to look forward to
  • Winners are announced when promised (generally within 6 weeks)

Okay, so that’s more than a few, but I haven’t come up with any reasons not to enter. There’s really nothing to lose, and only some spur-of-the-moment writing-to-a-prompt experience to gain (at a minimum).

My method for tackling the entry is: read the prompt and word count limit as soon as the e-mail arrives. Scratch out initial thoughts. Go out for a walk or get lunch and think about the prompt – think about what the ‘typical’ responses might be (the 1st 6 or so that come to mind should be ignored or twisted into something new). Do a free write without worrying about spelling or word count. Pull the nuggets out from the free write. Write a ‘real’ story. Step away from it. Read it. Step away again. Tweak it. Sleep on it. Make final revisions and submit a few hours before deadline.

This past weekend was the Spring contest. The Summer contest is going to be on July 13, and is now open for sign ups. Yep, I’ve already reserved my seat.

Do you have a favorite contest, or one that you find worthwhile? I’d love to hear about it.

Lisa J. JacksonLisa J. Jackson makes a living helping businesses express themselves with words and writing about NH. She has decided to complete several 5Ks in 2013 as a way to get off the couch and away from the screen. She drinks iced coffee year-round, and needs a stash of Peppermint Patties in the fridge at all times. You can connect with her on LinkedInBiznikFacebook, and Twitter

Read Full Post »

Friday Fun is a group post from the writers of the NHWN blog. Each week, we’ll pose and answer a different, get-to-know-us question. We hope you’ll join in by providing your answer in the comments.

QUESTION: When it comes to publishing, PR, and promotion (including “platform building” and “marketing”), what causes you the most anxiety and what are you most comfortable handling?

Lisa J. JacksonLisa J. Jackson: What causes the most anxiety is doing in-person events. I’m getting better at it as I do more events, but being face-to-face with folks pushes me out of my comfort zone a lot. I like the uncomfortable feeling because it means I’m growing and pushing myself, but I get anxious when I feel the words don’t come right to mind when I need them. I can be quite comfortable with silence, just not when it’s an awkward pause as I formulate a sentence. I’m most comfortable with scheduling the time to do the tasks associated with PR and promotion. I can be inspired by an online or in-person activity and get it on my calendar with ease. I’m great with time management. :)

.

headshot_jw_thumbnailJamie Wallace: Though marketing is what I do for a living, I have yet to come at it from the perspective of a writer promoting her services or body of work. In fact, truth be told, I’ve done precious little self-marketing for my marketing business which runs primarily on word-of-mouth referrals and repeat business from happy customers. The types of marketing I’m most comfortable with are, unsurprisingly, content-related: blog posts, articles, ebooks, etc. I’ve also started experimenting with audio and may integrate some video later this year. Like Lisa, public speaking has always made me anxious. Though I’ve gotten much better thanks to work I did in my friend Cheryl’s Platinum Presence workshop, it’s something I still have to psych myself up for. At the end of the day, I believe that finding your marketing groove is more about mindset than about mastering any particular skill or technique. It’s about knowing that you have a right to be here. Once you get past that hurdle, the rest tends to come a lot easier.

Diane MacKinnon, MD, Master Certified Life CoachDiane MacKinnon: Most of my time in the past twenty years has been spent one-on-one with people, whether life-coaching clients or patients, and I’m most comfortable speaking with people (even groups) face-to-face, even when the topic is myself and what I have to offer. I find the whole social media thing very intimidating. I don’t want to waste people’s time with unnecessary content in their in-box or on their Facebook wall. I agree with Jamie, though. The most important thing is knowing you have a place at the table, whatever table you choose to sit at. That mindset took me a long time to develop, especially with regard to marketing, mostly because I trained as a physician at a time when it was considered really tacky to promote yourself in any way (before the advent of Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz.) I’m inspired by my colleagues skills at social media and plan to continue to learn from them. (Lisa helped me update my LinkedIn page just recently!)

hennrikus-web2Julie Hennrikus: As always, love reading what my blog mates have to say on this. Here’s my $.02–I am much better at promoting a friend than myself. So (and this is going to sound nuts, but here we go) J.A. Hennrikus author is a friend who I feel more comfortable promoting. I am getting much better at public speaking, and have a few other things I can talk about, so I can make it less about me me me, and more about engagement.

 

photo: M. Shafer

photo: M. Shafer

Deborah Lee Luskin: I love speaking in public! I love meeting my readers! But I don’t love asking for readings or sending out press releases or organizing all the details; this is when I wish I had a publicist. (Someday . . . ). But mostly, I like to write. I love being a contributor to this blog, and one of these days, I’ll start one of my own. But updating my website is one of those tasks that’s been on my “to do” list for going on two years. So much to do, so little time.

 

Read Full Post »

Friday Fun is a group post from the writers of the NHWN blog. Each week, we’ll pose and answer a different, get-to-know-us question. We hope you’ll join in by providing your answer in the comments.

QUESTION: So, you just landed the publishing deal of your dreams. What are you going to do now?

headshot_jw_thumbnailJamie Wallace: It’s a toss up: celebrate or panic. As much as publication is the ultimate goal for most writers, there is a heaping pile of pressure and responsibility that comes along with that winning lottery ticket. I have a feeling that my reaction would be something like the five stages of grief except that instead of denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance I’d probably have to work through disbelief, elation, and panic followed by a long period of butt-in-chair-itis, and – finally – some semblance of sanity. I suppose I won’t really know until it happens. (Note I said “until,” not “unless” … I’m an optimist.) ;)

photo: M. Shafer

photo: M. Shafer

Deborah Lee Luskin: After a good whoop and a holler and a splash of champagne, the hard work begins. The deal is just the beginning. The ink is barely dry before there are rewrites, galleys, proofreading, blurbs for the back page, a new author photo, website update, and gearing up for the marketing – which is huge – and distracting. So putting the current project in order – and on hold – while the marketing blitz takes over is important too. I’m ready: bring it on!

.

.

Lisa J Jackson writerLisa J. Jackson: I would definitely shout and do some strange gyrations that I call a “happy dance” or “celebration dance”. I actually shout, wiggle, and punch the air when I get any type of good writing news. I celebrate every little win, every positive step forward. It’s similar to not saving the china and crystal for “special occasions only” — why only celebrate the big things? Each day is ‘a present’, so I strive to treat it as such. Although landing a publisher and a book deal will definitely get more hoops and hollers than a new article request, I celebrate all the writing gigs that I get.

hennrikus-web2Julie Hennrikus: I would (will–positive thinking!) be thrilled. And own that for a few days. Then it is time to clear the decks, and get the book written, and written well, while continuing to build my platform and get ready to market. I am grateful that I am a member of both Sisters in Crime and Mystery Writers of America–both have built in support systems for navigating the waters. And I know enough writers that I respect the amount of work it takes to get a contract  and then to get the next one. But still–what a thrill.

Susan Nye: After lots of shouting, jumping up and down, popping champagne corks, tweeting, emailing, telephoning and posting the good news to any and all, I’d get down to the serious business of choosing my outfit to wear on the Today Show. Not really. As soon as the initial euphoria died down, it would be back to work. Just because the writer thinks the book is done, editors and publisher generally have lots of suggestions to make good great. I imagine I would be hitting the keys, pacing, editing and editing some more and then some!

Read Full Post »

Friday Fun is a group post from the writers of the NHWN blog. Each week, we’ll pose and answer a different, get-to-know-us question. We hope you’ll join in by providing your answer in the comments.

QUESTION: It’s the million-dollar question – would you rather get that traditional publishing deal, go the entrepreneurial route with independent publishing, or come up with a hybrid arrangement? Explain your preference.

Diane MacKinnon, MD, Master Certified Life CoachDiane MacKinnon: I’m in my 40′s, so I grew up imagining myself a published author with one of the big publishing companies, with an editor assigned to me and a big marketing budget! Well, that dream’s gone, but I still think it would be fun to have a publishing company want to publish my book. Having said that, I don’t think self-publishing has as much stigma as it used to. It depends what you are looking for. I can see the benefits of both. A lot of my coaching friends have self-published and they are very happy with with money they are making and the credibility they have gained from becoming authors. I think I’d still go with a traditional publisher if I ever finish the novel I’m working on (I’ll finish it, just not in the very near future.) I love that many authors are now publishing their own work and that publishers are then asking to represent them after the fact. I think a more equal playing field between publishers and authors is a very good thing!

wendy-shot Wendy Thomas: If we’re talking about hopes then I’d have to go with a big publishing house. It’s the same dream of an actress who wants to see her name in lights. If we’re going with reality, however, I think it’s more likely that I would go with an indie press. They seem to have a bit more marketing skills (hitting the specific audience) than the bigger houses do. To date, I have not looked into an indie press, but if and when the day comes, you better believe that I will put a lot of research into it. While there are some incredibly upstanding and reputable independent publishing houses out there, there are still far too many whose goal it is to part you from your money.

.

DLLDeborah Lee Luskin: My first novel was published by an independent micro-publisher with considerable success – including helping me have a choice of agents for my second book, which I’m hoping will come out with a mainstream house. If I were publishing non-fiction to a niche audience, I would definitely go indie by setting up my own imprint. Breaking into the market for literary fiction is harder. I learned a lot about both publishing and marketing with Into the Wilderness – and I took it as far as I could without an even greater investment in time, money and energy. In the end, I was glad to receive critical success with reviews and a prize and to sell 2,000 copies. It’s still available as an eBook, and I hope it will become available in soft cover again. The rights have reverted back to me, and I think about bringing it out myself, but right now I’m engaged in writing a new book, and I don’t want to break my momentum.

.

Lisa J Jackson writerLisa J. Jackson: All of the above! For my novels I’m hoping for a traditional publisher, for romantic novellas I’ve gone with an e-publisher but now have my rights back and will be self-publishing, and for business non-fiction I’ll look into indies to see what’s out there. I’m open to whichever avenues seem to fit my needs best at the time. To land with one of the Big Houses for my mystery novels would be spectacular, but I know a lot of successful novelists with smaller houses, so I’m open to that, too. As long as I’m writing and publishing to reach my audience, it’s all good.

hennrikus-web2Julie Hennrikus: Boy, is this a good question. I have a book I have been working on for a long time. And I may go the independent route with that at one point. But I also aspire to a traditional, mass market paperback deal. (Remember that I write mysteries.) There are so many opportunities for writers these days–the important thing is to make a deal with a reputable company, to know you will have to help (or do) marketing for you book, and that the business is a tough one. And learn from others, as much as possible.

Susan Nye: Definitely the traditional route. Many people distrust the taste and skills of publishers. They point to the twelve or thirteen publishers who turned A.J. Rowlings down. However, one didn’t. Publishers understand the market better than my family and friends who love my work. Not because it’s any good (even if it is) but because they love me. An editor will ensure that my book meets a certain standard of both interest and quality. He or she will then work with me to help make it the best it can be. Once published, the publisher has the knowledge, staff and network to provide marketing support and sales infrastructure. And yes, I know brand new authors need to do much of their own marketing but I don’t underestimate the connections a publisher has with the press, blogosphere, book wholesalers and retailers.

Read Full Post »

ITWplainIf “impatience is the bane of self publishing,” then well-crafted writing, careful editing and artful book design are its salvation. In this post, I outline the steps that transform a piece of writing into a publication. These are the steps required regardless of how the book is published: electronically, offset, or letterpress.

If you want to have a good product, you’ll start with developmental editing, which is a fancy term for readers who ask questions and make comments along the way.

Well-crafted writing is the result of practice and time, good research, excellent language, and most probably several drafts. Ideally, some of those drafts will benefit from developmental editing – an elegant name for feedback from at least one critical reader who can comment on the merit of the work and ask questions that will help the author revise and hone the book until it is truly polished.

This critical reader is not your mother, your best friend nor your spouse, but someone who cares more about your work than you, someone who reads for continuity, comprehension, and coherence, someone who will praise what is good and ask good questions about structure, characterization, and language. Because it can be difficult to find such a reader, it’s best to ask several dispassionate people to read and comment on your work between your first, fifth or fiftieth and final drafts.

Once a book is finished and the typescript prepared to the best of your ability, it needs copy-editing. A copy editor starts by correcting spelling, grammar and punctuation, makes sure that the language conforms to standard usage and is consistent. Copy-editing also includes checking facts and continuity.

Copy-editing is laborious, technical, and essential. It is also expensive – and worth every penny. A reader never notices when a book has been copy edited but always notices when it hasn’t. Books that aren’t copy edited are invariably filled with errors that mark them as the work of an amateur.

The copy editor returns the document to the author for corrections. Only then, does the text block (the words you wrote) get type set. This is more than simply justifying the margins; it includes a myriad of details that are critical to the reader’s experience of your work. There are industry standards that readers expect as well as subliminal design elements that can enhance a reader’s experience – elements such as typeface, margins, chapter headers, page numbers, breaks. If the book is well designed, a reader barely notices; if it’s not, a reader may deem the book unreadable.  I’m not a book designer; if I ever self publish, I’ll hire one.

Once the text block is type set, what you have are galleys: unbound pages that look like the pages of a book. At last, your work is starting to look like proofreadingsomething! – but there’s still more to be done. Galleys need to be proof-read – by a professional proofreader. A proofreader is a highly skilled technician who looks at both the meaning and the content of the type. Proofreaders don’t just check spelling; they correct the typesetting, marking where there are loose lines (too many spaces between letters), crashes (letters squished together); poorly-hyphenated words; widows and orphans (letters, words and lines that become separated from their words, sentences or paragraphs at a line break or at the end of a page).

Even after the galleys are proofed and corrected, there’s another step: the cold read. Someone who has never read the book before reads the corrected galleys. Once the galleys are approved, they can be put in their final format, be it paper or pixels. And there may need to be different designs for each.

When my publisher brought out Into the Wilderness, we went through all these stages. Despite professional copy-editing and professional proofreading, my cold reader found an instance of “waived” where it should have been “waved” (we changed it), but even he missed one place where I’d written “Ruth” (my daughter’s name) instead of “Rose” (the name of my character).  Readers have found one other error – not bad for 100,000 words. Mostly, it was a beautiful edition that is now out of print (but still available electronically).

This covers most of the text block – but not all. There’s still the front matter and back pages to consider: Front matter includes: Half title, Full title, Copyright, Table of Contents, Introduction, Acknowledgments, and Dedication. Back matter follows the text block: Epilogue, Glossary, Endnotes, Index. (Some authors place their acknowledgments in back, as well as an “About the Author” page.) Every element of these pages has to be designed, set and proofed.

DLLBut even when the text block is complete, you’re not done: a book needs a cover – and a spine and a back cover. But this is well outside my bailiwick. I’m glad to write the books – and to leave the design elements to someone with the talent and know-how to make a beautiful edition.

Deborah Lee Luskin is a novelist, essayist and educator. She lives in southern Vermont, and can be found on the web at www.deborahleeluskin.com

Read Full Post »

Friday Fun is a group post from the writers of the NHWN blog. Each week, we’ll pose and answer a different, get-to-know-us question. We hope you’ll join in by providing your answer in the comments.

QUESTION: Part 1: Are you building your author platform? Part 2: IF you are, how are you doing it?

Lisa J Jackson writerLisa J. Jackson: I’ve been building my author platform for a while now. I use the pseudonym Lisa Haselton for all my fiction. I started on MySpace with an author page, but that has since gone by way of the dinosaur. Right now I have a Facebook author page and a blog that get my name out there. Also, I use my pseudonym in my role as chat moderator at The Writer’s Chatroom to also build name recognition. I currently have short stories published; no novels yet, but it’s never too early to start building the platform!

DLLDeborah Lee Luskin: My author platform is secondary to my first love, which is writing. I publish about five essays a month: two are broadcast on Vermont Public Radio, two appear on this blog, and one appears in our local, independent, newspaper. These are a great way to reach and build an audience between novels, which I complete with much lesser frequency! I’m also on Facebook, with a page for myself and for my published novel, Into the Wilderness, and I have a wonderful webpage, which averages 50+ hits/day – which adds up to more people than I know. I have plans to update the website, to consolidate my Facebook pages, to learn how to tweet – and when it becomes imperative, I will. For now, it’s more important I just keep writing.

.

 

hennrikus-web2Julie Hennrikus: I have a Facebook page, and I use Twitter. A lot. I also have a blog (which I am terrible about keeping up with, but I try). And, of course, I am here. This year I am the President of Sisters in Crime New England, and I just joined Mystery Writers of America. All of these add to my platform, as does the rest of my life. I use social media for my StageSource life, and for Sisters in Crime, so it is all part of the practice. My social media mix is that you should tweet, share/like 80% for and about other people. 20% for yourself. So a lot of building a platform is being part of a community, and paying it forward for the day when I am (please please please) releasing a novel.

wendy-shotWendy Thomas: It’s so important to build your platform. It’s one of the first things any agent is going to ask you about when you submit a manuscript. Basically your platform should answer the question of why you are qualified to write what you write. It also answers the secondary question of “how many people could potentially buy your work?”

To be qualified in writing means that you have to get your name out there in your field and it has to be out there often. To accomplish this I’m on Twitter, Facebook, and write for several blogs. I write for newspapers, magazines, have been featured on TV and on radio.  I teach classes and give presentations. I try to comment on others blogs in the same genre as mine (quite honestly, that’s my weakest link simply due to time constraints.) I also send out press releases to local publications when I have something that is newsworthy.

At one point I was spending about 2 hours a day just on building my platform, I don’t have to allocate that much time anymore, but that’s only because I spent the time building up a solid foundation. Like it or not, part of writing is selling your expertise to the world and the only way to do that is to market your work.

headshot_jw_thumbnailJamie Wallace: I have not yet begun to build a platform as a fiction author, but I have put a lot of time and effort into building my platform as a marketing writer. Like Wendy, I write regularly for multiple blogs (mine as well as collaborative sites) and have guest posted on others. I have been interviewed on podcasts, presented and co-presented webinars, given in-person trainings and talks, and spoken on industry panels. I am also very engaged in social media, primarily Twitter. (Facebook, for me, is all about being social (not about business), and although it’s making some strides, LinkedIn is still a bit too stodgy for me.) In the world of my “day job,” I can trace almost all of my current work back to social media interactions. For instance, I met a woman several years ago while taking an online course about white paper writing. A year or so later, she referred me to an agency who then hired me for a project and has since hired me for about a dozen more. In another case, a friend who I originally met in that same online class gave me the heads up on an alert from a writing mentor who was going to be in town and was inviting people to join him for brunch. Both my friend and I showed up (and had a wonderful time). During the event, I connected with the woman sitting to my right. She and I have become great friends and she constantly refers work to me.

If you’d like to read more about my thoughts on this topic, you can check out my four-part series on building the writer’s platform. You may also like Building Your Social Network from Scratch. :) Good luck!

Read Full Post »

The-Reader-(Young-Woman-Reading-a-Book)            It’s easy to get published, but hard to be read.

Advances in technology have made it possible for anyone with access to the internet to self-publish. Unfortunately, finding readers is not as easy – especially for those writers who do not have a specific audience in mind. Worse, the ease with which one can rush work into public on a blog, eBook or even print-on-demand (POD), can easily compromise the quality of that work – so that no one will read it. While the stigma of self-publishing has waned, the flood of impatiently published work continues to mar a great deal of that work. Impatience is the bane of self-publishing.

Consider my friend Abe (not his real name), who contacted me recently for advice about publishing his poems. He had “35 poems which are almost at the stage of showability,” and he’d contacted iUniverse, CreateSpace and ExLibris. He wanted my advice about which one he should use.

His request raised two red flags: 1) “showability” is not the same as “ready for publication,” and 2) these self-publishing giants make publishing easy and profitable – for them.

In an effort to be both gentle with Abe and protective of my time, I suggested he read Sonja Hakala’s, Your Book, Your Way, which clearly spells out a variety of self-publishing options, including publishing independently.

I also asked him how he planned to market the book.

“If people aren’t delighted by my poems, or haven’t taken the trouble to know about them, that is their problem. If I have to market my stuff to get it read, I probably shouldn’t have written it in the first place!”

I replied, “Abe, I’ve known you for eight years, and I never knew you wrote poetry!”

I asked Abe if he belonged to any workshops, ever read any of his poems in public, or did any of the other legwork involved in building an audience. And I told him how engrossing and exhausting my own marketing journey was with Into The Wilderness. I’d like to think I’m a realist, not the pessimist Abe reacted to:

“Gosh, Deb, you make it sound like so much fun! If I didn’t have to manage a full psychiatric practice and a full teaching load, if I weren’t rowing and singing in operas, if I didn’t have nine and a half grandchildren strewn all over the northeast – I would dig right in!”

In the end, Abe chose to go with CreateSpace. “At $2.15 a copy, I plan to distribute at least 100 copies to friends and other key people, asking them to spread the word.” He also thanked me. “Our vigorous dialogue was helpful,” he said.

Abe can easily afford the monetary outlay for this publishing venture, and he will gain an audience for it. He will be read, and that is, after all, the point of being a writer.

But is all writing suitable for publication? Just who is it we write for?

As a published writer with a growing audience, I can tell you that hearing from readers who have been moved by my work is both extremely gratifying and humbling beyond belief. Hearing from readers reminds me that publication brings with it responsibility, a responsibility to write with honesty, clarity and grace – all of which take patience, revision, time.

DLLDeborah Lee Luskin is a regular commentator on Vermont Public Radio and the author of Into the Wilderness, winner of the 2011 IPPY Gold Medal for Regional Fiction. Learn more at www.deborahleeluskin.com

 

 

Read Full Post »

DLLRegular Live to Write – Write to Live blogger Deborah Lee Luskin recently posted Raising a Writer. Here’s a post by that young writer, who by changing the language, offers a new way to think about sending work out.

**************************************

It’s hard to get excited about submitting. Submission Opportunity sounds dirty. As a twenty-three year old, just starting out, I have far too many opportunities to submit in my personal and professional life. And I work in a literary office, so I know the odds: they’re grim. But working on the other end of the submission spectrum has offered me a new perspective: as much as I’d like to believe that the gatekeepers to literary success are ogres, this job has taught me that the opposite is true. Each work is read with compassion and dedication, read by people who have dedicated their lives to soliciting new work. So, regardless of whether I like the lingo or not, to assert myself as a writer, I have to bite the linguistic bullet and submit my work.

I offer this: Instead of submitting to a competition, agent, or publisher, submit for. Submit for the opportunity to start something new, to clear your head, to know the draft is done.  Submit for the personal satisfaction of having done your best. Or, if you really need to spin it, submit for the person who will read it, for the opportunity to share your work with a stranger, to make someone else’s day a little less lonely. Because it will. Reading new work gives me hope to know that there are so many writers brave enough to share their work.

My evaluation is only one step in the process of how work is chosen. I can’t guarantee anything, certainly not fame or fortune, but what I can give each writer is my undivided attention while reading her work. I step into the world she has created and then ask what it taught me about myself. That’s a gift I can never repay, certainly not one that can be quantified with a royalty check. The authors who crafted these stories may never receive validation from my office (although many, even those not selected, do), but their characters step away from the page and inhabit my day. Some of them accompany home and keep me smiling all week. Others visit unexpectedly, months later, and remind me the enduring power of stories.

Submitting your work is an act of generosity. You give someone the chance to read a story they’d never heard before. And you create an audience, even if it’s only one person. Now, my submission is empowered with the knowledge that my work will be read. For now, that’s enough. . . But still really hard.

I’ve made a submission schedule with the goal that the more I practice it, the less scary it will become; submitting my work will feel less like submitting my whole self. The added perk is that the schedule keeps me moving forward.  Having an outside deadline helps for the days I’d prefer to clean my toilet than write. And sometimes it’s fun to write within parameters I wouldn’t have thought of for myself.

But it’s not foolproof. This past month I chickened out.  Frustrated by the contest I should have heard back from weeks ago, I let myself slump. Then, angry at the judges for not giving me the courtesy of a response, I invited six friends over to read the play I’d submitted. I was one chair short. My attempt at gluten-free baking was a catastrophe. But the play came to life. Best of all, I got feedback and encouragement from the people I care about most. It taught me that there will be other opportunities for this play, ones I can make for myself.

And in the meantime, I remind myself that each work I submit is a gift for the person lucky enough to read it.

How do you get yourself to submit your work?

NGSjan13Naomi Shafer is a Dramaturgy/Literary Management Intern at the Actors Theatre of Louisville, where her play Lucid is about to premiere in a festival of short plays. She is the editor of the Intern Company Blog and a contributing writer for inside Actors, the theatre’s newsletter. Shafer holds a B.A. in Sociology and Theatre from Middlebury College.

Read Full Post »

Knights Tale LegerThe scary part isn’t the writing. The scary part is putting your writing out into the world.

We writers can hack the long hours at the keyboard, wrestling with the blank page and coaxing our muses forth. We have grown accustomed to the voices in our heads – characters, critics, and editors. We and our personal demons have arrived at a working truce that allows us to get the words down.

But that’s just the first part of the battle, isn’t it?

If you’re hoping to get published, you have to not only create, but also promote. You must market yourself and your work to an audience. You must put everything out there where other people can see it, consume it, and judge it worthy … or not.

THAT is the scary part.

That is the thing – as much as, if not more than, lack of drive or talent or productivity – that keeps wannabe authors from becoming published authors.

I bring this up because this is my last post here at Live to Write – Write to Live until after the New Year and I didn’t want to miss my opportunity to give you a little 2013 pep talk.

I know that December is a time for reflecting back on the year gone by and scrying into the year ahead. This is the time of year many of us make resolutions and intentions. We try to cast off bad habits and establish new, healthier ones. As writers, many of our thoughts orbit closely around our creative work and dreams: What have I accomplished? What do I hope to accomplish? How will I reach me writing goals in 2013? Do I really have what it takes? Should I even bother?

If you’re not careful you can go careening off a cliff of self-doubt and insecurity.

That’s not good for your marketing.

How can you confidently and competently market yourself if you don’t believe you have anything to offer? How can you make the right connections and impressions if you feel like you don’t deserve to be here?

You can’t.

In my day job, I help my clients develop standout brands and craft great content. Though I work mostly with large companies, I do sometimes have the pleasure of working with authors, artists, designers, creative entrepreneurs, etc. In my experience, the first order of business with these folks isn’t establishing a value proposition or unearthing the brand story or developing the voice for the website. The first order of business is getting the client into the “marketing mindset.”

If you’re going to have to go out there and sell yourself and your work (which, you will have to do if you want to be published), you need to get into a marketing mindset, too. You need to believe that you have a right to be here.

I wrote a post about this on my home blog at Suddenly Marketing. I’d love for you to head over there and read Marketing Mindset 101: You have a right to be here. It’s my soapbox pep talk. It’s what I say to friends and clients who seem unsure, tentative, and doubtful when it comes to marketing themselves. It’s my rallying cry to incite people to action.

2013 is a brand new year, people.

Anything is possible.

This might be your year.

Are you ready to make the most of it?

Do you have the right marketing mindset?

Jamie Lee Wallace is a writer who also happens to be a marketer. She helps her Suddenly Marketing clients discover their voice, connect with their audience, and find their marketing groove. She is also a mom, a prolific blogger, and a student of voice and trapeze (not at the same time). Introduce yourself on facebook or twitter. She doesn’t bite … usually.

.

Image from A Knight’s Tale © 2001 Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. All Rights Reserved – sourced from IMDB

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 24,349 other followers